Comments for The Realism http://realism.wordpress.com The reality Sat, 03 May 2008 10:47:30 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on BIBLE & TRINITY: Conflict by realism http://realism.wordpress.com/2007/04/30/bible-trinity-conflict/#comment-3 realism Sat, 03 May 2008 10:47:30 +0000 http://realism.wordpress.com/2007/04/30/bible-trinity-conflict/#comment-3 So mayaritte ur saying bible is falible and can have errors? If yes then how can you trust such book? Do you believe jesus to be God? you can visit www.stickam.com groupchat: Islamtalk also So mayaritte ur saying bible is falible and can have errors? If yes then how can you trust such book?

Do you believe jesus to be God?

you can visit http://www.stickam.com groupchat: Islamtalk also

]]> Comment on BIBLE & TRINITY: Conflict by mayaritte http://realism.wordpress.com/2007/04/30/bible-trinity-conflict/#comment-2 mayaritte Fri, 02 May 2008 19:11:58 +0000 http://realism.wordpress.com/2007/04/30/bible-trinity-conflict/#comment-2 This proves nothing. Because what you are base your conclusions on, the Bibleassuming that it is INFALIBLE, to attack concepts derived form thesame Bible concepts!!! You must know that the Nicae Counsil was called just to define that relationship. Whatever you believe or oppose in right now or not, is in reference to decisions made by falible men in that Council. Theere were many Christian churches represented (supposed experts, no?) and some had to be killed to silence their opinions. The deicion to call the council was a political one reached by Constantine to have a body of Christina that belive in one and only one CREED decided upon by the council so that his governmnet did not have to deal with many factions of believers an dconsolidate his reign. It is oustanding how people get to even hate each other about definitions and decisions over conceptualizations made by mortal, defective men (we all are) centuries ago. It is not impoitant whether you believe that or not. He is or he is not independently of your belief. Who knows? No one knows. This proves nothing.
Because what you are base your conclusions on, the Bibleassuming that it is INFALIBLE, to attack concepts derived form thesame Bible concepts!!!

You must know that the Nicae Counsil was called just to define that relationship. Whatever you believe or oppose in right now or not, is in reference to decisions made by falible men in that Council. Theere were many Christian churches represented (supposed experts, no?) and some had to be killed to silence their opinions. The deicion to call the council was a political one reached by Constantine to have a body of Christina that belive in one and only one CREED decided upon by the council so that his governmnet did not have to deal with many factions of believers an dconsolidate his reign.

It is oustanding how people get to even hate each other about definitions and decisions over conceptualizations made by mortal, defective men (we all are) centuries ago. It is not impoitant whether you believe that or not. He is or he is not independently of your belief. Who knows? No one knows.

]]>